Cisco 1720 Router OID

[bletchley]

I set up MRTG to monitor our Cisco 1720 router's input/output bandwidth. Now I'm trying to get ZABBIX to do the same. ZABBIX can connect to the router and get a lot of SNMP data out of it but none of them are like what MRTG displayed. I'm after a current kbps value rather than a total packet counts value.

I've used Cisco's SNMP Translator and inputted the OID values into ZABBIX and it just comes back saying "not supported."

Can someone please help out the newbie? THANK YOU!

[crinago]

hi i'm having the same problem here for one of my snmp devices. i can snmpget OID values but not on zabbix. I've been searching for any help in this forum but to no avail.... it's been very frustrating... if you can come up with anything please post...thanx!

[Alexei]

Do you see any reasons (timeout, not such OID, etc) in the zabbix_suckerd's log file?

[bletchley]

Do you see any reasons (timeout, not such OID, etc) in the zabbix_suckerd's log file?

Hello Alexei and thank you for your help! Below is an excerpt from my zabbix_suckerd.log:

012394:20050516:203354 Expression [{11214}>0] cannot be evaluated.
012394:20050516:203354 Evaluation of expression [{11211}>0] failed
012394:20050516:203354 Expression [{11211}>0] cannot be evaluated.
012394:20050516:203354 Evaluation of expression [{11286}>150000] failed
012394:20050516:203354 Expression [{11286}>150000] cannot be evaluated.
012394:20050516:203354 Evaluation of expression [{11337}>150000] failed
012394:20050516:203354 Expression [{11337}>150000] cannot be evaluated.
012394:20050516:203401 Error in packet
Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
...
012394:20050516:203401 Parameter [ifDescr20] is not supported by agent on host [Cisco1720]
012394:20050516:203401 Evaluation of expression [{11213}>100] failed
...
012394:20050516:203745 Expression [{11337}>150000] cannot be evaluated.
012394:20050516:204105 Error in packet
Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.

There are hundreds of thousands of lines that look like the first few I posted. The only two differences are the second and third blocks. That's it. :confused: