Is that possible to apply a dependancy on another LLD rule, for example, defined in linked template?
My use case is:
I have an SNMP PHY Interfaces template using IF-MIB::ifTable scan that filters discovered items with some regexp. Then I want to filter D-Link DGS-3100 STP through previously defined rule (scan only those rldot1dStpPortEntries that correspond to items discovered by ifTable scan and filter, this is necessary because of D-link's firmware bug: rldot1dStpPortTable in Dlink DGS-3100 consists of entries even not present in ifTable). But I don't want to define STP item/trigger prototypes within ifTable-based rule, because that causes a lack of flexibility for configurations monitored.
My use case is:
I have an SNMP PHY Interfaces template using IF-MIB::ifTable scan that filters discovered items with some regexp. Then I want to filter D-Link DGS-3100 STP through previously defined rule (scan only those rldot1dStpPortEntries that correspond to items discovered by ifTable scan and filter, this is necessary because of D-link's firmware bug: rldot1dStpPortTable in Dlink DGS-3100 consists of entries even not present in ifTable). But I don't want to define STP item/trigger prototypes within ifTable-based rule, because that causes a lack of flexibility for configurations monitored.