The host context menu lists scripts available based on "all" and a Host group. When a script is common to many Host Groups, the script needs to defined many times.
How do people feel about making the script (also) linked to a template? This way when a Host is defined with one of more templates you get the scripts that support the objects in its specific Template.
Extending this a little, the Scripts related to a Template can be contained in the Template Export and Import, keeping Monitoring and Control together. the down side of this would Script name conflicts.
Extending this to the extreme, Scripts could be linked to Items within the Template. This would remove Item related Script clutter from the Host context Menu.
How do people feel about making the script (also) linked to a template? This way when a Host is defined with one of more templates you get the scripts that support the objects in its specific Template.
Extending this a little, the Scripts related to a Template can be contained in the Template Export and Import, keeping Monitoring and Control together. the down side of this would Script name conflicts.
Extending this to the extreme, Scripts could be linked to Items within the Template. This would remove Item related Script clutter from the Host context Menu.