Hello All,
I use more than 4 years Big Sister.
Now, after testing, I see many advantages at Zabbix.
But before the final decision I very much would like to have the answer to such question.
is it possible to realize with Zabbix the following scenario (this scenario works now with Big Sister):
1. We want to have a Zabbix-Server and a Zabbix-Agent (without Websevice and SQL). The agent shall test the ping and ftp-connection (only thet) to another server. This server is not visible for the Zabbix-Server.
2. If the connection fails the Zabbix-Agent sents an alarm to the Zabbix-Server and there the decision is made what this alarm leads to
(e.g.: Alarm on Web-surface or e-mail-alarm).
Many thanks in advance.
Best Regards.
Leonid.
I use more than 4 years Big Sister.
Now, after testing, I see many advantages at Zabbix.
But before the final decision I very much would like to have the answer to such question.
is it possible to realize with Zabbix the following scenario (this scenario works now with Big Sister):
1. We want to have a Zabbix-Server and a Zabbix-Agent (without Websevice and SQL). The agent shall test the ping and ftp-connection (only thet) to another server. This server is not visible for the Zabbix-Server.
2. If the connection fails the Zabbix-Agent sents an alarm to the Zabbix-Server and there the decision is made what this alarm leads to
(e.g.: Alarm on Web-surface or e-mail-alarm).
Many thanks in advance.
Best Regards.
Leonid.
Comment