Ad Widget

Collapse

net.if.in and net.if.out not working right

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marius
    Member
    • Apr 2006
    • 47

    #1

    net.if.in and net.if.out not working right

    I have net.if.in[eth0], net.if.in[eth1], net.if.out[eth0], and net.if.out[eth1] all configured identically with "float" type, Bps unit, 8 mutiplier, speed per second, etc.

    For some bizarre reason, only net.if.in[eth0] is collecting data. The other three are always showing 0 Bps.

    So I looked at the agent logs and found that the other three are always sending the same number: 4294967295.

    Any idea what's going on? I'm using Beta9.

    thanks.
  • marius
    Member
    • Apr 2006
    • 47

    #2
    bug?

    it appears that this might be a bug. I think zabbix is hitting the int/float limit. Will this be fixed in beta10? I can attempt to fix interfaces.* files myself or write a custom script, but if it will be fixed in beta10 i'd rather wait.

    Comment

    • Alexei
      Founder, CEO
      Zabbix Certified Trainer
      Zabbix Certified SpecialistZabbix Certified Professional
      • Sep 2004
      • 5654

      #3
      What correct big number do you expect from net.if.in[eth1]?
      Alexei Vladishev
      Creator of Zabbix, Product manager
      New York | Tokyo | Riga
      My Twitter

      Comment

      • just2blue4u
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2006
        • 347

        #4
        see my thread ... i got a similar problem. This could really be int limit!
        Big ZABBIX is watching you!
        (... and my 48 hosts, 4513 items, 1280 triggers via zabbix v1.6 on CentOS 5.0)

        Comment

        • marius
          Member
          • Apr 2006
          • 47

          #5
          Originally posted by Alexei
          What correct big number do you expect from net.if.in[eth1]?
          eth1:17773837926 22979267 0 0 0 0 0 4036 4808081744 19905268 0 0 0 0 0 0

          Comment

          • marius
            Member
            • Apr 2006
            • 47

            #6
            FYI. This issue still not fixed in beta10.

            Comment

            • madm1ke
              Junior Member
              • May 2006
              • 7

              #7
              I have that on x86_64 with 32bit-agent.
              It has been fixed by simple recompiling agent in 64bit.

              Comment

              • marius
                Member
                • Apr 2006
                • 47

                #8
                Originally posted by madm1ke
                I have that on x86_64 with 32bit-agent.
                It has been fixed by simple recompiling agent in 64bit.
                Ah... duh. I think that's it - i'll give it a shot. thanks!

                [edit] that was it. thanks for the help madm1ke! [/edit]
                Last edited by marius; 24-05-2006, 18:53.

                Comment

                Working...