Hello,
Please look at the picture. The graphs of all servers have been "patchy" and consisted of disconnected fragments during the period when one of the servers lacked zabbix_agentd, and instantly regained normal shape once that process was started.
My setup includes 9 running copies of zabbix_server (while only 7 servers are monitored). Each client runs 6 copies of zabbix_agentd. Could this strange interdependency of monitored data be explained by wrong process numbers choice?
Please look at the picture. The graphs of all servers have been "patchy" and consisted of disconnected fragments during the period when one of the servers lacked zabbix_agentd, and instantly regained normal shape once that process was started.
My setup includes 9 running copies of zabbix_server (while only 7 servers are monitored). Each client runs 6 copies of zabbix_agentd. Could this strange interdependency of monitored data be explained by wrong process numbers choice?
Comment