Ad Widget

Collapse

Question about zabbix_server.conf

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • krusty
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 222

    #1

    Question about zabbix_server.conf

    Hi,
    i have allready fixed my problem with bad performance on my zabbix server. I have modified the entries on zabbix_server.conf file. Know i have the following entries:

    Code:
    ############ GENERAL PARAMETERS #################
    
    # This defines which server this is.
    # Default value 1
    # This parameter must be between 1 and 255
    Server=10
    
    # Number of pre-forked instances of pollers
    # Default value is 6
    # This parameter must be between 5 and 255
    StartSuckers=24
    
    # Number of pre-forked instances of trappers
    # Default value is 5
    # This parameter must be between 2 and 255
    StartTrappers=16
    Know my question. Are this values okay? Which context is between the entries Server and StartSuckers?

    [edit] With this values my Server with 1200 hosts run very nice.
  • bbrendon
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2005
    • 870

    #2
    Sorry, no feedback on the performance config, but how much bandwidth does this server with 1200 monitored hosts use?

    i'm still working my way to 100.
    Unofficial Zabbix Expert
    Blog, Corporate Site

    Comment

    • krusty
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2005
      • 222

      #3
      Originally posted by bbrendon
      Sorry, no feedback on the performance config, but how much bandwidth does this server with 1200 monitored hosts use?

      i'm still working my way to 100.

      I have eth0 in status monitoring and the incoming traffic is about 5kps the outgoing is about 25kps. I think this is really ok. Isn“t it?

      Comment

      • bbrendon
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2005
        • 870

        #4
        kilobytes per sec right? not bits.

        That sounds reasonable for the amount of hosts you're monitoring. i was just curious.
        Unofficial Zabbix Expert
        Blog, Corporate Site

        Comment

        • krusty
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2005
          • 222

          #5
          Originally posted by bbrendon
          kilobytes per sec right? not bits.

          That sounds reasonable for the amount of hosts you're monitoring. i was just curious.
          Yes you are right. I was amazing too.

          Comment

          Working...