Hello,
im having a problem triing to get I/O from the FS mounted on linux servers. I just added another item prototype to the existing low level discovery in the template "Template OS linux" but the items become usupported.
Tryng to get manually the request from the command line i get:
/opt/zabbix/bin/zabbix_get -s SERVERNAME -k vfs.dev.read[/tmp]
ZBX_NOTSUPPORTED
but the other "vfs" items works correctly. For example:
/opt/zabbix/bin/zabbix_get -s SERVERNAME -k vfs.fs.size[/tmp]
46139891712
Odd enough if i use the real device name ( not the moutpoint) the result change:
/opt/zabbix/bin/zabbix_get -s SERVERNAME -k vfs.dev.read[/dev/mapper/rootvg-root]
0.000000 ( the result its alwasys 0.000 on any mount point, so probably it does'nt work either, butr at least im not getting the "ZBX_NOTSUPPORTED")
So for some reasons seems that those 2 specific items have problems if you pass {#FSNAME} value from the low level discovery.
I did something wrong or i really discovered a bug?
Any advice even for a workaound would be really apprecyated. I need to monitor disk IO for my san-attached LUN's. If there is any other way i would use it too.
tnx in advance.
im having a problem triing to get I/O from the FS mounted on linux servers. I just added another item prototype to the existing low level discovery in the template "Template OS linux" but the items become usupported.
Tryng to get manually the request from the command line i get:
/opt/zabbix/bin/zabbix_get -s SERVERNAME -k vfs.dev.read[/tmp]
ZBX_NOTSUPPORTED
but the other "vfs" items works correctly. For example:
/opt/zabbix/bin/zabbix_get -s SERVERNAME -k vfs.fs.size[/tmp]
46139891712
Odd enough if i use the real device name ( not the moutpoint) the result change:
/opt/zabbix/bin/zabbix_get -s SERVERNAME -k vfs.dev.read[/dev/mapper/rootvg-root]
0.000000 ( the result its alwasys 0.000 on any mount point, so probably it does'nt work either, butr at least im not getting the "ZBX_NOTSUPPORTED")
So for some reasons seems that those 2 specific items have problems if you pass {#FSNAME} value from the low level discovery.
I did something wrong or i really discovered a bug?
Any advice even for a workaound would be really apprecyated. I need to monitor disk IO for my san-attached LUN's. If there is any other way i would use it too.
tnx in advance.
Comment