We're currently using SNMPTT and trapping, among other techniques, to monitor our network.
I've got a trap item configured to watch out for the follow line in the snmptt.log file:
Now the full line, in the snmptt.log file might read
"The following feature has exceeded its allowed licensed usage: logical-system."
I've configured a trigger to alert us if we get such a trap. But is there a way I can get the actual log entry to appear in the name of the alert?
Specifically I would want the "logical-system" part to be included in the name, since this is a variable part that the engineer on call would need to know about.
Normally I would adjust the snmptt file and make the log entry to include something that we've discovered through polling (so that I can match against it after LLD), but the MIB for the device in question doesn't allow me to do this.
Is there a variable like "License exceeded {SNMPTT.ENTRY}" or similar that I can use as the name of the trigger? (I've just made-up that variable name, but hopefully that gets the idea across)
Thanks in advance. Happy to clarify if this isn't clear enough.
I've got a trap item configured to watch out for the follow line in the snmptt.log file:
| snmptrap["The following feature has exceeded its allowed licensed usage: .*"] |
"The following feature has exceeded its allowed licensed usage: logical-system."
I've configured a trigger to alert us if we get such a trap. But is there a way I can get the actual log entry to appear in the name of the alert?
Specifically I would want the "logical-system" part to be included in the name, since this is a variable part that the engineer on call would need to know about.
Normally I would adjust the snmptt file and make the log entry to include something that we've discovered through polling (so that I can match against it after LLD), but the MIB for the device in question doesn't allow me to do this.
Is there a variable like "License exceeded {SNMPTT.ENTRY}" or similar that I can use as the name of the trigger? (I've just made-up that variable name, but hopefully that gets the idea across)
Thanks in advance. Happy to clarify if this isn't clear enough.

Comment