Ad Widget

Collapse

Latency - URL [Smokeping]

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slence
    Member
    • Nov 2014
    • 41

    #1

    Latency - URL [Smokeping]

    Hi,

    I want to measure the latency of some url's with smokeping. There's a way to do this? Someone already did it?

    Thanks.
  • valegator
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2016
    • 18

    #2
    Zabbix native

    Zabbix does support native measurment of website latency with "webchecks":

    Comment

    • slence
      Member
      • Nov 2014
      • 41

      #3
      Originally posted by valegator
      Zabbix does support native measurment of website latency with "webchecks":
      https://www.zabbix.com/documentation...web_monitoring
      Hi,

      Thanks for your reply.

      I've tried this, but the URL that I need to ping, doesn't allow to "connect":

      Error: Timeout was reached: Connection timed out after 15000 milliseconds

      What is the best option? Ping and measure with smokeping?

      Comment

      • valegator
        Junior Member
        • Jul 2016
        • 18

        #4
        Multiple latencies available

        You could also measure basic TCP or ICMP latency natively, for example:

        1. Measuring HTTP service performance (without actually getting the whole website):
        net.tcp.service.perf[http,<ip>,<port>]
        2. Measuring TCP latency to the web service port:
        net.tcp.service.perf[tcp,<ip>,80]
        3. Measuring ICMP ping latency:
        icmppingsec

        All of these keys return seconds as unit, zero if down. You have to remove the <VALUE> fields in the keys when you're not using them, e.g. net.tcp.service.perf[tcp,,80].

        Comment

        • slence
          Member
          • Nov 2014
          • 41

          #5
          So I add this as an item, right?

          And then create a graph to add the data?

          i've add it and have zero as de return!

          Comment

          • slence
            Member
            • Nov 2014
            • 41

            #6
            I need to do this with https protocol!

            Comment

            Working...