I'm trying to imagine an architecture where an HA pair can also support disaster failover, even if manually.
I believe Zabbix HA is two (or more?) active Zabbix hosts connecting to the same database engine. I have 10gig fiber between my primary and backup datacenters, I wonder if Zabbix will be happy with Zabbix A and MySQL in the primary datacenter and Zabbix B in the backup.
Then, for DR purposes, MySQL replication tools to replicate the database to the Backup DC. In the event of genuine disaster, Zabbix B (still in my imagination) could be re-pointed to MySQL B?
So, two questions (three, including "is anyone already doing this???") : Will Zabbix be happy with an HA secondary server being separated from the primary and database by 10Gbit? And can the Zabbix secondary be made primary (or standalone) and manually connected to a replicated copy of the database?
I believe Zabbix HA is two (or more?) active Zabbix hosts connecting to the same database engine. I have 10gig fiber between my primary and backup datacenters, I wonder if Zabbix will be happy with Zabbix A and MySQL in the primary datacenter and Zabbix B in the backup.
Then, for DR purposes, MySQL replication tools to replicate the database to the Backup DC. In the event of genuine disaster, Zabbix B (still in my imagination) could be re-pointed to MySQL B?
So, two questions (three, including "is anyone already doing this???") : Will Zabbix be happy with an HA secondary server being separated from the primary and database by 10Gbit? And can the Zabbix secondary be made primary (or standalone) and manually connected to a replicated copy of the database?
Comment