My site is looking for additional background on why EnableGlobalScripts changed defaults at 7.0.x.
The change is documented and Cyber, Markku and others have helped people discover the setting. I understand all that.
What I'm looking for is more information on why the Zabbix developers changed the default for new installs. It's easy to guess that having it disabled is a more secure setting, but the problem is that without additional information about what the potential attack might be, it's very hard to estimate risk. At my site, I trust all my (current) users to not do anything intentionally malicious.
I also understand that providing information about a potential security issue is a balancing act. You don't want to make an attack to obvious or easy, but providing no details makes it impossible for a site admin to assess risk.
The change is documented and Cyber, Markku and others have helped people discover the setting. I understand all that.
What I'm looking for is more information on why the Zabbix developers changed the default for new installs. It's easy to guess that having it disabled is a more secure setting, but the problem is that without additional information about what the potential attack might be, it's very hard to estimate risk. At my site, I trust all my (current) users to not do anything intentionally malicious.
I also understand that providing information about a potential security issue is a balancing act. You don't want to make an attack to obvious or easy, but providing no details makes it impossible for a site admin to assess risk.