Guys,
Question/concern... This may not be easily answered, but I guess I will try...
Currently, we have several nagios installations and monitor them independently.
Lets say there are 2 networks in question... 172.17.0.0 and 172.17.1.0... Both of these class B networks are full of hosts, and there are certain firewall policies in place, which prohibit certain access. These policies make it be easier, if you could have a zabbix server in each network, running independent checks, and have it report back to a single mysql instance.
In essence, have Z1 in 172.17.0.50 and Z2 in 172.17.1.54 and Z3 in 172.17.2.43. All 3 of these boxes will have their mysql database in M1 172.17.4.4 and php riding elsewhere...
Is this possible? Or do we need to stick with one installation, and punch firewall holes for each network check?
Best Regards,
Vasiliy
Question/concern... This may not be easily answered, but I guess I will try...
Currently, we have several nagios installations and monitor them independently.
Lets say there are 2 networks in question... 172.17.0.0 and 172.17.1.0... Both of these class B networks are full of hosts, and there are certain firewall policies in place, which prohibit certain access. These policies make it be easier, if you could have a zabbix server in each network, running independent checks, and have it report back to a single mysql instance.
In essence, have Z1 in 172.17.0.50 and Z2 in 172.17.1.54 and Z3 in 172.17.2.43. All 3 of these boxes will have their mysql database in M1 172.17.4.4 and php riding elsewhere...
Is this possible? Or do we need to stick with one installation, and punch firewall holes for each network check?
Best Regards,
Vasiliy
after testing and dissecting now see that
Comment