Ad Widget

Collapse

Make icmpping items Agent-based...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • makini
    Member
    • Jul 2006
    • 59

    #1

    Make icmpping items Agent-based...

    Hi,

    As far as I know from the docs and forums, all icmpping items (icmppingsec, icmppingloss) are Simple checks and made from the Server.
    Might it be a good idea to optionally make those run from an Agent too? Or is there some logic behind such a design decision?

    It's highly necessary under a distributed setup we have and is quite a burden to setup as external items with a script.
    7
    Yes, please add this.
    100.00%
    7
    Not necessary. (Any reason)
    0.00%
    0
    Last edited by makini; 14-09-2010, 16:15. Reason: Slightly rude, but, added a poll...
  • Doomshammer
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2007
    • 22

    #2
    Originally posted by makini
    Hi,
    Might it be a good idea to optionally make those run from an Agent too?
    I absolutelly sign this request. I would love to see agents being able to send icmpping[] requests, so that we can monitor the same host from different locations.

    Comment

    • danrog
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 164

      #3
      Until something is built-in you could just create a system.run item

      system.run["ping -c1 host | grep seq=1 | sed -r 's/.*time=(.*) ms/\1/'"]

      You could also make it into a UserParameter as well. If you have fping installed every where you can use that too.

      Comment

      • makini
        Member
        • Jul 2006
        • 59

        #4
        Sure - all valid options

        Originally posted by danrog
        Until something is built-in you could just create a system.run item

        system.run["ping -c1 host | grep seq=1 | sed -r 's/.*time=(.*) ms/\1/'"]

        You could also make it into a UserParameter as well. If you have fping installed every where you can use that too.
        Both are valid options here, sure. It can of course be set up in many different ways. The question is about facilitating it into the Agent and if there actually was some rationale behind implementing it this way initially. So far, no one (authorized) says this will be ever added or even considered...

        Comment

        • ShivaS
          Member
          • Oct 2005
          • 51

          #5
          Originally posted by makini
          Hi,

          As far as I know from the docs and forums, all icmpping items (icmppingsec, icmppingloss) are Simple checks and made from the Server.
          Might it be a good idea to optionally make those run from an Agent too? Or is there some logic behind such a design decision?

          It's highly necessary under a distributed setup we have and is quite a burden to setup as external items with a script.
          I second that! ICMP is a basic thing for every monitoring solution and built-in implementation of it would really really make our lives easier!

          Comment

          Working...