Hi all,
I do not know if somebody has same feeling like me but I think that there is some problem in poller.c or somewhere. It is not realy bug, maybe feature request, and it belongs to queue management.
I thing there should be some check befor poller tries to catch some data. That check should do this:
- isn't it too late to catch data ? (we do not need catch value 5 minutes later, if we have next values each minute). Sometimes when I see log, I think, that if something is unreachable some time, poller tries to get same values more times in same time. Am I wrong?
- Maximum host requests per time check
- Maximum host group requests per time check
Maybe in future, but I know this will be harder to achieve:
- Maximum bandwidth per host
- Maximum bandwidth per group
There is question, what to do with queries which are over quota. Simplest is to drop them, of course...
Is this scenario/concept acceptable for user/developers?
Thanx.
Lukas
I do not know if somebody has same feeling like me but I think that there is some problem in poller.c or somewhere. It is not realy bug, maybe feature request, and it belongs to queue management.
I thing there should be some check befor poller tries to catch some data. That check should do this:
- isn't it too late to catch data ? (we do not need catch value 5 minutes later, if we have next values each minute). Sometimes when I see log, I think, that if something is unreachable some time, poller tries to get same values more times in same time. Am I wrong?
- Maximum host requests per time check
- Maximum host group requests per time check
Maybe in future, but I know this will be harder to achieve:
- Maximum bandwidth per host
- Maximum bandwidth per group
There is question, what to do with queries which are over quota. Simplest is to drop them, of course...
Is this scenario/concept acceptable for user/developers?
Thanx.
Lukas
In today situation, zabbix can do too much traffic on that line without our control. It can happen due to problem which I discused here.
Comment