I tried to find something like this by searching, but found nothing, so hopefully this hasn't been discussed previously.
I think the graphics for the LTS release time scale need to be redone/fixed, because the graphic doesn't match what is given in the text/tables, which could be misleading to people skimming the article.
Specifically, on this page I am referencing this image:
which is referenced as "Life cycle of Zabbix LTS release."
It implies 4.5 years of "Full Support" + 2 years of "Limited Support" (though shown as 2.5 years, from halfway of years 4 and 5 to end of year 7).
When in actuality, as I read it from the supporting text, that 1.5 years of "Production" should be a part of "Full Support", rather than in front of it.
Or more succinctly, "Production" should be 1.5 years, and "Full Support" should be 1.5 (additional) years, and "Limited Support" be 2 (additional) years (1.5+1.5+2=5).
I think that image just needs to have the text and year markers changed to reflect the actual timeline, otherwise it could be misleading.
I think the graphics for the LTS release time scale need to be redone/fixed, because the graphic doesn't match what is given in the text/tables, which could be misleading to people skimming the article.
Specifically, on this page I am referencing this image:
which is referenced as "Life cycle of Zabbix LTS release."
It implies 4.5 years of "Full Support" + 2 years of "Limited Support" (though shown as 2.5 years, from halfway of years 4 and 5 to end of year 7).
When in actuality, as I read it from the supporting text, that 1.5 years of "Production" should be a part of "Full Support", rather than in front of it.
Or more succinctly, "Production" should be 1.5 years, and "Full Support" should be 1.5 (additional) years, and "Limited Support" be 2 (additional) years (1.5+1.5+2=5).
I think that image just needs to have the text and year markers changed to reflect the actual timeline, otherwise it could be misleading.
Comment