vfs.dev.* for many device

[damstux]

Hi,

I'm monitoring some host with many storage devices:

iostat result:

Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
cciss/c0d0 7.97 38.95 190.35 375882143 1837119547
cciss/c0d0p1 0.00 0.00 0.00 17008 4
cciss/c0d0p2 0.00 0.00 0.00 10246 480
cciss/c0d0p3 1.22 2.22 9.42 21428131 90944088
cciss/c0d0p5 22.12 36.72 180.92 354418310 1746174847
sda 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdb 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdc 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdd 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sde 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdf 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdg 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdh 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdi 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdj 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdk 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdl 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdm 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdn 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdo 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdp 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sdq 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdr 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 0
sds 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdt 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdu 80.12 397.03 229.50 3831905076 2214991320
sdv 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdw 50.65 197.03 169.08 1901584610 1631823088
sdx 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdy 45.27 330.64 154.71 3191116040 1493160416
sdz 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdaa 65.39 21.32 189.92 205805032 1832947768
sdab 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdac 67.53 360.65 218.24 3480760008 2106332952
sdad 1.09 116.08 143.15 1120324362 1381604112
sdae 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdaf 49.72 278.01 174.86 2683182777 1687658432
sdag 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdah 38.18 370.40 137.05 3574886641 1322730080
sdai 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdaj 81.53 242.14 141.10 2336976436 1361832912
sdak 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdal 194.41 243.68 361.37 2351830785 3487732668
sdam 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0
sdan 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 0


/usr/local/zabbix/sbin/zabbix_get -s MYHOST -k vfs.dev.write[sda,,] = OK
/usr/local/zabbix/sbin/zabbix_get -s MYHOST -k vfs.dev.write[sdf,,] = OK
BUT
/usr/local/zabbix/sbin/zabbix_get -s MYHOST -k vfs.dev.write[sdg,,] = ZBX_NOTSUPPORTED
/usr/local/zabbix/sbin/zabbix_get -s MYHOST -k vfs.dev.write[cciss/c0d0p5,,] = ZBX_NOTSUPPORTED

I use 1.6.6 zabbix agent
/usr/local/zabbix/sbin/zabbix_get -s chanoine -k agent.version
1.6.6

It's the same problem on other hosts, only sda to sdf are ok

[richlv]

could you please report this on the bugtracker ? thanks.