Hello everyone,
Yesterday i stumbled across some strange behaviour with zabbix 1.1 concerning the definition of actions.
In my setup i have defined a template with one icmpping item and one trigger "Host offline" which goes TRUE whenever a host is not pingable for 5 minutes. Till here everything's fine. When i shut down a test host created with this template the trigger fires up.
Only problem I have is, that if I define an action with conditions "Trigger=Host offline" (the one from the template) and "Trigger Value=On" no Message is being sent. If I however define that action with "Trigger=Host offline" from the host itself, the action fires up and the notification gets send.
I intend to use this ping-check for about a 100 remote hosts in my network, but as it looks i would have to define one action per host i'd like to check, which would result in hundreds of action definitions for one and the same notification.
What i'd like to know is this a bug or intended by design (and if so maybe why?). Developer feedback appreciated.
H_Man
Yesterday i stumbled across some strange behaviour with zabbix 1.1 concerning the definition of actions.
In my setup i have defined a template with one icmpping item and one trigger "Host offline" which goes TRUE whenever a host is not pingable for 5 minutes. Till here everything's fine. When i shut down a test host created with this template the trigger fires up.
Only problem I have is, that if I define an action with conditions "Trigger=Host offline" (the one from the template) and "Trigger Value=On" no Message is being sent. If I however define that action with "Trigger=Host offline" from the host itself, the action fires up and the notification gets send.
I intend to use this ping-check for about a 100 remote hosts in my network, but as it looks i would have to define one action per host i'd like to check, which would result in hundreds of action definitions for one and the same notification.
What i'd like to know is this a bug or intended by design (and if so maybe why?). Developer feedback appreciated.
H_Man
Comment