Availability report error

[antkamidiv]

Hi,

I've installed zabbix 2.2.3 on CentOS 6.5. I use zabbix to monitor availability of my mikrotik routers by ping and configure Template ICMP Ping. Availability report always shows 100% OK, but there are some routers that are unreachable.

[ingus.vilnis]

Hi!

Do you see the triggers in problem state for the routers that are unreachable?

In Reports → Availability report you can see what proportion of time each trigger has been in problem/ok state. The percentage of time for each state is displayed. (https://www.zabbix.com/documentation...s/availability)

Best Regards,
Ingus

[antkamidiv]

Thanks for reply!
Actually the table of availability report shows all triggers in OK state for all routers.
But some routers are unreachable and triggers must be in PROBLEM state. And graph bar of problem router shows percentage of OK and PROBLEM states.
However the table of availability report doesn't show PROBLEM states.

[ingus.vilnis]

Not sure I understood you correct but If your routers are unreachable and triggers MUST be in PROBLEM state but are NOT, then you have to deal with this problem first and only then look for availability reports.

Check Monitoring -> Triggers. Do you have them in PROBLEM state for unreachable routers there?

Best Regards,
Ingus

[antkamidiv]

Sorry for confusing You. English isn't my native language.
I'll show You what I meant.
1st image is my availability report. The problem router is underlined. In the table that line contains following values: OK state 100% and PROBLEMS 0%. If I click Show link in the Graph column I see the 2nd picture. As You can notice the trigger is working! But availability report doesn't show percentage of the PROBLEM state in the table.
I hope now You understand me )))

[aib]

In documentation you can see the absolutely same picture.
100% availability, BUT some parts of histogram is RED(trigger state was PROBLEM)

https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/ru/2.2/manual/web_interface/frontend_sections/reports/availability

[antkamidiv]

To aib,
Thanks for your answer! But these images is provided as examples and they don't even reflect events in the same time period. 1st one is belong to April, 2014. The 2nd is belong to 2013 year. So this is just coincidence.

Good news. My problem is solved! I have to wait a week to see the changes in the table.

[Frank Peng]

I resolve it.