Ad Widget

Collapse

SNMPv3 and Cisco SG350 Connects but Not Populating Zabbix - Using SHA/AES SNMPv3

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • indianajones
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2020
    • 20

    #1

    SNMPv3 and Cisco SG350 Connects but Not Populating Zabbix - Using SHA/AES SNMPv3

    Ok, I am able to perform an snmpwalk on my Cisco device and pull all OIDs, no problem. I loaded a template and everything gets discovered. I can even run a test and pull numbers. However, the Zabbix Server (v5.0.7) Monitoring -> Latest Data provides the following visual of nothing being populated:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	screenshot1.png
Views:	904
Size:	95.7 KB
ID:	422298

    Then, I test the List Item and get a result back on each:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	screenshot3.png
Views:	877
Size:	98.5 KB
ID:	422299

    However, I am still not getting the data populated in the list above or in my graphs:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	screenshot4.png
Views:	852
Size:	101.6 KB
ID:	422300

    What am I doing wrong?
    Attached Files
  • indianajones
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2020
    • 20

    #2
    Originally posted by cyber
    History storage set to 0 ??
    If you are referring to my
    Code:
    /etc/zabbix/zabbix_server.conf
    file having:

    Code:
    ### Option: HistoryStorageDateIndex
    # Enable preprocessing of history values in history storage to store values in different indices based on date.
    # 0 - disable
    # 1 - enable
    #
    # Mandatory: no
    # Default:
    # HistoryStorageDateIndex=0
    I have now uncommented it, changed the setting to 1 and restart zabbix-server. The Monitoring -> Latest Data still does not show any data. I have tried going between Bulk Requests enabled and disabled and nothing.

    Or, if you are referring to the template itself, this is what I used and after reviewing the XML, it appears to have history greater than 0:
    https://share.zabbix.com/network_dev...g300-and-sg200

    Here is a listing of my hous
    ekeeping options, as they are now:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	screenshot5.png
Views:	838
Size:	53.1 KB
ID:	422326
    Last edited by indianajones; 05-04-2021, 16:08. Reason: Added Housekeeping Options Screenshot and Template Used

    Comment

    • indianajones
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2020
      • 20

      #3
      Got it, my History is 7d for all Items. Should I change it?

      Comment

      • Rudlafik
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2018
        • 144

        #4
        Term of history is yours choice. In our company take ordes an agreements our customers for SLA 30 - 90 days. We need take detail history of specific itemsin this intervals for check errors. Our customers didnt acpetcs only trends. I have PosgreSQL and TimescalingDB addon and this is perfect for our using. Disc space consum isl dramaticaly low and housekeeping - what is it?! ;-) In first time i dont check override and housekeeping load every hour 25min on 100% after I check Override on all boxes than TimescaleDB bite to Postges zabbix DB and dramatickly compres data and brutal delete sliced micro DB older than storage perior. I se on my eye that paradox: I aplicated 90 day on ALL items in History and my space has up of 5% free next day. Sorry loooong shortcut ;-).

        Hi, I have the same problem on Cisco on cheap switches. On CISCO ASA, everything is fine when using SNMPv3. Also the HPE and SNMPv3 servers on our ZBX 5.4.8 are OK. However, it is interesting behavior when querying OID from different MiB according to RFC. Of course, everything is fine on SNMPv2 and everything will load. According to CISCO, the RFC of some MiB libraries is poorly implemented. For some SNMPv3 OID queries, you will not get an answer for some. I combined different levels of authPriv security and nowhere did I find a working way to apply functional SNMPv3 to CISCA's soho products. After consulting with LAN / WAN product professionals, I came to the conclusion that CISCO branded another company's product and emulated - strangely - its IOS in its Linux OS. Just another waste from CISCO. We are now disposing of these switches and buying active components from HPE and Fortigate. They are cheaper in price, performance in the same way as CISCO and at least comply with RFC standards. Before the HPE arrives, the "waste" CISCO goes to SNMPv2.Click image for larger version

Name:	snmp_LI.jpg
Views:	904
Size:	88.8 KB
ID:	436607

        Comment

        • cyber
          Senior Member
          Zabbix Certified SpecialistZabbix Certified Professional
          • Dec 2006
          • 4807

          #5
          History storage set to 0 ??

          Comment

          • cyber
            Senior Member
            Zabbix Certified SpecialistZabbix Certified Professional
            • Dec 2006
            • 4807

            #6
            Nono, I don't know anything about your server config..
            In item config, "History storage period"...
            I have seen same question, "Why does my data not show up in "Latest data"?"... and the answer was, item history was set to 0.....

            Comment

            • cyber
              Senior Member
              Zabbix Certified SpecialistZabbix Certified Professional
              • Dec 2006
              • 4807

              #7
              No, in that part everything is ok then... I was just curious. But I have no good ideas right now, where to look next...

              Comment

              Working...