Ad Widget

Collapse

3.0.3 Screen Graph Potential issues?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dafyre
    Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 44

    #1

    3.0.3 Screen Graph Potential issues?

    Hi All,

    I"m just now noticing an issue when working with Screens and Graphs. I have a stacked graph for Total Memory and used memory... When Viewing from Monitor -> Graphs -> (select my host) -> Memory Usage (as the graph), it shows correctly... (zabbix-memory-usage-graph-correct (second attachment))

    When I view this host from Monitor -> Screens -> Screen with this graph, I get a graph that shows the combined totals (see screen-wrong, first attachment).

    This is a Zabbix 3.0.3 system. The item is templated.

    Is this a bug, or has it been fixed in 3.0.4?
    Attached Files
    Last edited by dafyre; 14-08-2016, 06:15. Reason: Describe attachments.
  • dafyre
    Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 44

    #2
    Graph Template Configuration

    I've attached the graph configuration is here:



    (I ran out of upload space, lol).

    Comment

    • kloczek
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2006
      • 1771

      #3
      Try right click on each of those imagee, choose "Image view" and compare in both cases graphid in URLs in both cases. I'm almost sue that you have defined two graphs with exactly the same series of data but one normal and second one stacked.
      http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/tomasz-k%...zko/6/940/430/
      https://kloczek.wordpress.com/
      zapish - Zabbix API SHell binding https://github.com/kloczek/zapish
      My zabbix templates https://github.com/kloczek/zabbix-templates

      Comment

      • dafyre
        Member
        • Sep 2008
        • 44

        #4
        Originally posted by kloczek
        Try right click on each of those imagee, choose "Image view" and compare in both cases graphid in URLs in both cases. I'm almost sue that you have defined two graphs with exactly the same series of data but one normal and second one stacked.
        I did go back and double check, and didn't see any extras hanging out there.

        But I did notice the Y-Axis value was set to calculated, instead of Memory Total. That appears to have been the source of my problem.

        Comment

        Working...