Windows 1.4 agent vs. 1.1.7 Agent

[dratliff]

Hello,

I have been installing the 1.4 agent on new machines and upgrading the machines that have the 1.1.7 agent on them. I uninstall, and reinstall, no problem.

The issue is with the data that I am returning. I am using the performance keys to return data to my server. If I use the 1.1.7 agent and the 1.4 server, I get all my data back. If I use the 1.4 agent and the 1.4 server, all I get back are the active agents' data and zabbix built-in functions (uptime).

Have I missed something? Is there another setting in the agent .conf that I need to set? There is no indication in the agent log file that there is a problem. I just get nothing back. Has anyone else experienced this? Or is there another thread that has already addressed this.

Thank you,

Dave

[Alexei]

Please give me a list of items which does not work with 1.4 agent. If the items are defined in zabbix_agentd.conf, I'd like to see the file as well.

[dratliff]

Alexei,

Here is the agent .conf that works fine for 1.1.7 agents, but doesn't for 1.4 agents.

PerfCounter = srv_c_disk_free,"\LogicalDisk(C: )\Free Megabytes",30
PerfCounter = srv_logical_disk_time,"\LogicalDisk(_Total)\% Disk Time",30
PerfCounter = srv_mem_pg_sec,"\Memory\Pages/sec",30
PerfCounter = srv_pf_total,"\Process(_Total)\Page Faults/sec",30
PerfCounter = srv_virt_total,"\Process(_Total)\Virtual Bytes",30
PerfCounter = srv_proc_total,"\Processor(_Total)\% Processor Time",30
PerfCounter = srv_nic_in,"\Network Interface(Intel[R] PRO_100 S Server Adapter)\Bytes Received/sec",30
PerfCounter = srv_nic_out,"\Network Interface(Intel[R] PRO_100 S Server Adapter)\Bytes Sent/sec",30
PerfCounter = srv_nic_bw,"\Network Interface(Intel[R] PRO_100 S Server Adapter)\Current Bandwidth",30

[NOB]

Hi,

what happens if you turn some of the PerfCounter to Alias ?

Regards,

Norbert.

[dratliff]

Norbert,

do you mean something like:

<aliasname> = <keyname>, "<\PERFORMANCE\Key>", <poll time>

I haven't changed anything like that. It is worth a shot though.

Thank you,

Dave