Ad Widget

Collapse

Incorrect key format for Simple check (version 1.4.1)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • claytronic
    Member
    • Nov 2006
    • 52

    #1

    Incorrect key format for Simple check (version 1.4.1)

    Hello fellow Zabbix users and developers,

    I'm trying to setup a few simple checks for monitoring a HTTP service running on port 8000 using the 1.4.1 UI. According to the latest Zabbix manual the syntax format is http,<ip>,<port>. When I attempt to save this new simple check, the UI reports Incorrect key format 'key_name[param1,param2,...]'.

    When I try the UI's recommended syntax http[192.168.0.196,8000] I get this error Port number must be numeric in [http[192.168.0.196,8000]].


    Here's my input values:

    Description: HTTP Check Port 8000
    Type: Simple check
    Key: http,192.168.0.196,8000
    Type of information: Numeric

    Am I dealing with a 1.4.1 UI bug or just missing something obvious?

    Thanks in advance,
    Claytronic
    Last edited by claytronic; 25-07-2007, 18:13.
  • gescheit
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2007
    • 156

    #2
    This is a bug. Use UI from zabbix 1.4.0

    Comment

    • evgeny elkin
      Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 52

      #3
      Hello! the same problem......

      Comment

      • claytronic
        Member
        • Nov 2006
        • 52

        #4
        Any chance there is a "simple" php fix for the 1.4.1 frontend? Simple checks are a very important feature.

        --
        Clayton

        Comment

        • Alexei
          Founder, CEO
          Zabbix Certified Trainer
          Zabbix Certified SpecialistZabbix Certified Professional
          • Sep 2004
          • 5654

          #5
          Please use frontend files from pre 1.4.2. This problem is fixed there.

          Download it from www.zabbix.com/developers.php
          Alexei Vladishev
          Creator of Zabbix, Product manager
          New York | Tokyo | Riga
          My Twitter

          Comment

          • claytronic
            Member
            • Nov 2006
            • 52

            #6
            Fix looks good. Looking forward to official 1.4.2 release.

            Thanks for the follow up, Alexei.

            --
            Claytronic

            Comment

            Working...