A number of my hosts using snmp to fetch information (HP/UX 11 servers) are having some troubles. It seems some of the SNMP values are returning and some arent... from the logs it looks like this is the problem. However i dont use a mib for lookups i use the specific OID (number) so the mib should not be required....
Could it be that too many snmp requests are going out at the same time... this worked before on 1.5,1.6,1.7. But suddenly broke on 1.7.... so i upgraded to 1.8 and still having the same issue.
If i run snmpget from commandline on the zabbix server it brings back the values no problem, so its not a connectivity issue.
Help!
015185:20060412:180005 SNMP error [(noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.]
015181:20060412:180005 SNMP error in packet. Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
015181:20060412:180005 SNMP error [(noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.]
015181:20060412:180005 SNMP error in packet. Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
015185:20060412:180426 Cannot connect to [XXXXX] [Connection refused]
015185:20060412:180426 Host [XXXXX] will be checked after [60] seconds
Could it be that too many snmp requests are going out at the same time... this worked before on 1.5,1.6,1.7. But suddenly broke on 1.7.... so i upgraded to 1.8 and still having the same issue.
If i run snmpget from commandline on the zabbix server it brings back the values no problem, so its not a connectivity issue.
Help!
015185:20060412:180005 SNMP error [(noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.]
015181:20060412:180005 SNMP error in packet. Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
015181:20060412:180005 SNMP error [(noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.]
015181:20060412:180005 SNMP error in packet. Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB.
015185:20060412:180426 Cannot connect to [XXXXX] [Connection refused]
015185:20060412:180426 Host [XXXXX] will be checked after [60] seconds
Comment