First of all, the nodata trigger is great, really, but it has one downside.
When a zabbix_server has been down for more than the nodata(<time>) all triggers, and related action, fire and our server sends out tons of email and sms alerts . . . which kinda sucks.
The reason for this is that this trigger works independantly of the actual received data. It just compares the timestamp of the last received item value, not the value.
So my question is; does anyone now of a way (or is using a method) to not have the nodata triggers fire on zabbix_server start for at least 1x or 2x the poll interval of the item its for?
(or another way to prevent the nodata triggers from going off at the wrong time).
When a zabbix_server has been down for more than the nodata(<time>) all triggers, and related action, fire and our server sends out tons of email and sms alerts . . . which kinda sucks.
The reason for this is that this trigger works independantly of the actual received data. It just compares the timestamp of the last received item value, not the value.
So my question is; does anyone now of a way (or is using a method) to not have the nodata triggers fire on zabbix_server start for at least 1x or 2x the poll interval of the item its for?
(or another way to prevent the nodata triggers from going off at the wrong time).


Comment