Hi,
I have an issue with using snmpv3 with some devices.
Zabbix zerver version: 3.0.1
Net-snmp version: 5.7.2
I added two cisco routers on Zabbix and linked the same template to both.
One of them is monitored without any problem.
The other router was monitored without errors during 10 hours and then it became 'unavailable by snmp' with error "Timeout while connecting to..."
Meanwhile snmpget works fine.
The tcpdump output of failed check shows that there is no answer with data from router, the only data I have is a report about dropped requests:
When I run snmpget on zabbix server I have the correct output:
And this is what tcpdump shows in this case:
I've read a lot of information about possible causes but still have no answer.
Also I have to say that network configuration wasn't changed and that I've checked all EngineID's on my network and they are all unique.
Does anybody have the same problem?
I have an issue with using snmpv3 with some devices.
Zabbix zerver version: 3.0.1
Net-snmp version: 5.7.2
I added two cisco routers on Zabbix and linked the same template to both.
One of them is monitored without any problem.
The other router was monitored without errors during 10 hours and then it became 'unavailable by snmp' with error "Timeout while connecting to..."
Meanwhile snmpget works fine.
The tcpdump output of failed check shows that there is no answer with data from router, the only data I have is a report about dropped requests:
Code:
16:26:04.064796 IP 192.168.10.252.52075 > 10.11.11.254.snmp: F=r U= E= C= GetRequest(14) 16:26:04.082442 IP 192.168.10.252.37416 > 10.11.11.254.snmp: F=apr U=snmpuser [!scoped PDU]0f_92_ab_8e_e7_a2_a9_8d_13_27_d2_60_8f_1e_ae_c6_c3_61_cc_12_0b_05_d1_f7_ac_6c_1d_86_ac_7c_59_1f_89_48_98_1c_d7_04_49_26_80_ce_a3_91_9a_0d_d4_5c_68_91_8a_48_ed_5a_99_cb 16:26:04.087753 IP 10.11.11.254.snmp > 192.168.10.252.52075: F= U= E= 0x800x000x000x090x030x000xEC0xBD0x1D0x280x510x58 C= Report(32) .1.3.6.1.6.3.15.1.1.4.0=3655 16:26:04.088121 IP 192.168.10.252.52075 > 10.11.11.254.snmp: F=apr U=snmpuser [!scoped PDU]58_62_f2_9b_52_e0_1a_53_5b_9a_cc_8a_a1_a7_f5_67_9e_d7_9a_94_70_98_2d_77_b3_fd_2d_bc_0c_e7_44_9d_57_22_e9_4e_38_25_0f_3d_b7_33_c7_7c_8f_a5_60_aa_1c_f1_33_2c_27_c0_fc_92 16:26:19.103239 IP 192.168.10.252.52075 > 10.11.11.254.snmp: F=apr U=snmpuser [!scoped PDU]3f_c8_b6_bb_39_b6_aa_8b_cb_21_89_6b_bf_3d_59_31_5f_da_87_f4_d5_03_a3_4a_1d_f3_29_6a_94_f0_a0_7f_00_82_b8_ed_92_99_05_2f_ae_43_92_ef_6d_7d_4f_74_78_dc_84_89_c2_29_2c_3c 16:26:19.113663 IP 192.168.10.252.59323 > 10.11.11.254.snmp: F=r U= E= C= GetRequest(14) 16:26:19.148463 IP 10.11.11.254.snmp > 192.168.10.252.59323: F= U= E= 0x800x000x000x090x030x000xEC0xBD0x1D0x280x510x58 C= Report(32) .1.3.6.1.6.3.15.1.1.4.0=3656 16:26:19.148726 IP 192.168.10.252.59323 > 10.11.11.254.snmp: F=apr U=snmpuser [!scoped PDU]c1_06_82_ff_f0_26_04_6c_78_f4_27_aa_f5_ec_e1_39_d2_29_e0_25_51_0c_21_8f_a4_bd_0f_b3_f9_df_bd_23_ea_50_84_66_a2_37_f8_2f_23_7c_39_6c_43_01_41_4f_77_5f_af_9b_cd_04_46_f9
Code:
snmpget -v3 -l authPriv -u snpuser -a sha -A 'authpass' -x AES -X privpass 10.11.11.254 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.48.1.1.1.6.2 SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.48.1.1.1.6.2 = Gauge32: 24544240
Code:
19:16:00.267284 IP 192.168.10.252.41494 > 10.11.11.254.snmp: F=r U= E= C= GetRequest(14) 19:16:00.294419 IP 10.11.11.254.snmp > 192.168.10.252.41494: F= U= E= 0x800x000x000x090x030x000xEC0xBD0x1D0x280x510x58 C= Report(32) .1.3.6.1.6.3.15.1.1.4.0=3774 19:16:00.294682 IP 192.168.10.252.41494 > 10.11.11.254.snmp: F=apr U=snmpuser [!scoped PDU]1a_a9_1e_3f_a3_51_55_a0_b0_46_c7_4c_df_1c_f5_40_79_a1_7c_8d_29_c1_42_0b_0a_70_c4_d1_5b_2b_e6_15_c5_a1_da_41_3e_3a_45_73_d0_b6_f5_f5_b0_ff_03_6b_b8_2e_2f_08_22 19:16:00.318018 IP 10.11.11.254.snmp > 192.168.10.252.41494: F=ap U=snmpuser [!scoped PDU]92_80_40_54_90_6a_bd_ae_56_68_d0_51_d6_9e_82_5e_3f_f2_68_a1_37_b0_55_8b_66_4a_9f_62_6d_5a_ff_49_7c_95_f0_ec_87_c3_55_c8_80_35_e8_ef_64_ab_cd_97_42_93_f7_9b_9d_38_4e_cf_3c
Also I have to say that network configuration wasn't changed and that I've checked all EngineID's on my network and they are all unique.
Does anybody have the same problem?
Comment